This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
RE: where do stack traces get filled in?
- From: Andrew Haley <aph at cambridge dot redhat dot com>
- To: "Boehm, Hans" <hans_boehm at hp dot com>
- Cc: "'Jeff Sturm'" <jsturm at one-point dot com>, tromey at redhat dot com,Adam Megacz <gcj at lists dot megacz dot com>, java at gcc dot gnu dot org,"MOSBERGER, DAVID (HP-PaloAlto,unix3)" <davidm at hpl dot hp dot com>,"'rth at redhat dot com'" <rth at redhat dot com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 05:45:04 +0000 (GMT)
- Subject: RE: where do stack traces get filled in?
- References: <40700B4C02ABD5119F000090278766443BEE2D@hplex1.hpl.hp.com>
Boehm, Hans writes:
> David Mosberger has started a project to unify all the unwind code for IA64,
> and has discussed this with Richard Henderson. This started out relying on
> a lower level IA64-specific unwinder interface. But the latest version of
> the interface is intended to be machine-independent.
>
> I'm not sure whether this will be done in a 3.1 timeframe. (I'm personally
> also a little concerned about doing this to close before a release.) But
> David (and Richard?) should definitely be involved in any discussions along
> these lines.
Oh yes., of course I wasn't suggesting that this was in any way a new
idea of mine -- I heard about the idea before in the IA-64 context.
I'm glad there is to be a real machine-independent interface -- that
will help libgcj a lot.
Andrew.