This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
RE: GCJ information
- From: "Ghanta, Bose" <bose dot ghanta at stratus dot com>
- To: "'tromey at redhat dot com'" <tromey at redhat dot com>, "Ghanta, Bose" <bose dot ghanta at stratus dot com>
- Cc: "'java at gcc dot gnu dot org'" <java at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 10:55:45 -0500
- Subject: RE: GCJ information
Hi Tom,
Thank you for the responses and I appreciate it. The two issues I asked
you, "Dynamic dependency analysis; Minimal compilation" I was not also
sure, but thought you might know something on them. Anyway, they are not
that important
Thank you,
Bose
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Tromey [mailto:tromey@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:35 AM
To: Ghanta, Bose
Cc: 'java@gcc.gnu.org'
Subject: Re: GCJ information
>>>>> "Bose" == Ghanta, Bose <bose.ghanta@stratus.com> writes:
Bose> When do we expect to see Gcj 3.1 release (approximate timeframe)?
See http://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html.
According to that, gcj 3.1 will be available April 15 2002.
Bose> Dynamic loading of native code
Yes.
Bose> Dynamic dependency analysis
Bose> Minimal compilation
What do you mean?
Bose> Does not require dynamic linking in OS
You mean shared libraries? You can build libgcj statically. There
may be some warts there, though, as people don't regularly test this.
Tom