This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Stack size

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: "Steen Jansdal" <steen at jansdal dot dk>
Cc: <java at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: 06 Dec 2001 08:24:29 -0700
Subject: Re: Stack size
References: <055901c17da0$e403faf0$3f01a8c0@steen> <3C0EB85C.5080809@waitaki.otago.ac.nz> <00b301c17e2a$1f1c2930$3f01a8c0@steen>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "Steen" == Steen Jansdal <steen@jansdal.dk> writes:

Steen> The reason I'm asking this is that I'm trying to evaluate if Linux 
Steen> on a x86 is going to be the platform for our next embedded 
Steen> device. The memory on this device are limited to 16 or 32 Mb.
Steen> The programs for this device are going to heavy multithreaded,
Steen> and consist of a web-server, a soap-server and several user
Steen> programs. It is my highest wish that we can use java as our
Steen> language. C++ is too difficult to maintain.

Steen> Any advices for my evaluation are much appreciated.

With gcj you're always free to hack the library to do whatever you
like.  You could even add a Java API to control the stack size on a
per-thread basis.

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Stack size
  - From: Jonathan Olson
- Re: Stack size
  - From: Jonathan Olson

References:
- Stack size
  - From: Steen Jansdal
- Re: Stack size
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: Stack size
  - From: Steen Jansdal

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]