This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: native static inner class methods?

From: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at waitaki dot otago dot ac dot nz>
To: Adam Megacz <gcj at lists dot megacz dot com>
Cc: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2001 13:52:09 +1300
Subject: Re: native static inner class methods?
References: <86snaqh6g0.fsf@megacz.com> <3C0D694D.30309@waitaki.otago.ac.nz> <86667mh4xs.fsf@megacz.com>

Adam Megacz wrote:

>>Its because gcj and g++ disagree on how the "$" symbol should be 
>>mangled. IIRC, the C++ guys agreed that it should do what gcj does 
>>(mangle it to a unicode symbol), but they never implemented it.
>>
>
>Hrm, is this a lot of work for them? If not, I'm thinking of hopping
>on to the g++ list and groveling until somebody implements it. If I
>do this, do you mind if I quote your post?
>

Sure, it would be good to get this resolved. See also this old thread on 
the subject:

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-03/msg01667.html

regards

Bryce.

References:
- native static inner class methods?
  - From: Adam Megacz
- Re: native static inner class methods?
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: native static inner class methods?
  - From: Adam Megacz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]