This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: status of gcj's boehm collector?

From: Adam Megacz <gcj at lists dot megacz dot com>
Cc: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 04 Dec 2001 18:36:23 -0500
Subject: Re: status of gcj's boehm collector?
Organization: Myself
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10112041528200.31550-100000@mars.deadcafe.org>


Jeff Sturm <jsturm@one-point.com> writes:
> brief, there was really no benefit other than shorter pause times;

Yeah, but that would be a huge win for me. My project (www.xwt.org)
provides rich user interfaces for XML-RPC/SOAP web services. Latency
is paramount, throughput relitavely unimportant (I don't ask much of
the CPU).

Does anybody know any other tricks for reducing pause times? I guess
"create less objects" is one answer, and I'm going to try that...

  - a

References:
- RE: status of gcj's boehm collector?
  - From: Jeff Sturm

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]