This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: javax.naming work (Classpath vs ClasspathX)

To: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at waitaki dot otago dot ac dot nz>
Subject: Re: javax.naming work (Classpath vs ClasspathX)
From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
Date: 24 Oct 2001 15:00:14 -0600
Cc: Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org>, Per Bothner <per at bothner dot com>, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <20011019221701.A21077@klomp.org> <87u1wvwe6i.fsf@creche.redhat.com> <20011019230555.A21190@klomp.org> <87lmi7jh9c.fsf@creche.redhat.com> <3BD0C27A.2090406@bothner.com> <20011021234708.C26276@klomp.org> <87d73daa2z.fsf@creche.redhat.com> <3BD64CDF.6020502@waitaki.otago.ac.nz>
Reply-To: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "Bryce" == Bryce McKinlay <bryce@waitaki.otago.ac.nz> writes:

Tom> I believe the Classpath AWT was relicensed to pure GPL.

Bryce> No. It is LGPL.

I think it was supposed to have been relicensed to GPL at the time of
the merger, but nobody has actually gone through and changed the files
to reflect this.

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: javax.naming work (Classpath vs ClasspathX)
  - From: Mark Wielaard

References:
- Re: javax.naming work (Classpath vs ClasspathX)
  - From: Mark Wielaard
- Re: javax.naming work (Classpath vs ClasspathX)
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: javax.naming work (Classpath vs ClasspathX)
  - From: Per Bothner
- Re: javax.naming work (Classpath vs ClasspathX)
  - From: Mark Wielaard
- Re: javax.naming work (Classpath vs ClasspathX)
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: javax.naming work (Classpath vs ClasspathX)
  - From: Bryce McKinlay

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]