This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: another compiler better than gcj ?

To: "Bryce McKinlay" <bryce at waitaki dot otago dot ac dot nz>
Subject: Re: another compiler better than gcj ?
From: "Anthony Green" <green at redhat dot com>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 21:50:21 -0700
Cc: <tromey at redhat dot com>, "magnus persson" <mtmmtm at my-deja dot com>, <java at gcc dot gnu dot org>
References: <200110180905.f9I95rY28683@mail21.bigmailbox.com> <3BD26380.20203@waitaki.otago.ac.nz> <87n12jsi9u.fsf@creche.redhat.com> <3BD63913.3050509@waitaki.otago.ac.nz> <001401c15c42$76b11c00$5be6b4cd@cygnus.com> <3BD6457F.6040400@waitaki.otago.ac.nz>

Bryce wrote:
> Wouldn't the best solution for x86 integer divides be to just emit
> something like:
>
> if (__builtin_expect (divisor== 0), false)
>   _Jv_ThrowDivideByZero()
> else
>   .. do divide ..

Well, there's usually another goofy case we need to watch for.   See _Jv_divI
and friends in prims.cc.  Do we want to put all of these tests inline?

AG

Follow-Ups:
- Re: another compiler better than gcj ?
  - From: Bryce McKinlay

References:
- another compiler better than gcj ?
  - From: magnus persson
- Re: another compiler better than gcj ?
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: another compiler better than gcj ?
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: another compiler better than gcj ?
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: another compiler better than gcj ?
  - From: Anthony Green
- Re: another compiler better than gcj ?
  - From: Bryce McKinlay

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]