This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: another compiler better than gcj ?

To: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at waitaki dot otago dot ac dot nz>
Subject: Re: another compiler better than gcj ?
From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
Date: 22 Oct 2001 11:21:01 -0600
Cc: magnus persson <mtmmtm at my-deja dot com>, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <200110180905.f9I95rY28683@mail21.bigmailbox.com> <3BD26380.20203@waitaki.otago.ac.nz>
Reply-To: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "Bryce" == Bryce McKinlay <bryce@waitaki.otago.ac.nz> writes:

Bryce> I had a play with this today. I was impressed. It didn't manage
Bryce> to correctly run all the benchmarks I tried, but for those that
Bryce> did work it generated some very slick code, blowing away both
Bryce> GCJ and the IBM JDK at nearly everything I tried (mostly
Bryce> numerical tests)

It would be cool to see what it does differently.

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: another compiler better than gcj ?
  - From: Bryce McKinlay

References:
- another compiler better than gcj ?
  - From: magnus persson
- Re: another compiler better than gcj ?
  - From: Bryce McKinlay

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]