This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: javax.naming work (Classpath vs ClasspathX)
- To: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at waitaki dot otago dot ac dot nz>
- Subject: Re: javax.naming work (Classpath vs ClasspathX)
- From: Cedric Berger <cedric at wireless-networks dot com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 15:46:23 -0700
- CC: Nic Ferrier <nferrier at tf1 dot tapsellferrier dot co dot uk>,java at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <E15vdRx-0000hS-00@tf1.tapsellferrier.co.uk> <3BD4A0A0.5060705@waitaki.otago.ac.nz>
Bryce McKinlay wrote:
> Nic Ferrier wrote:
>
>> We (the ClasspathX people) want the FSF to rename the Guile licence to
>> a more generic name so that we can use it widely without confusion,
>> for example The Embedded Library GPL or The No Exception GPL.
>>
>
> This would be a very good idea. Possibly one of the biggest problems
> with this license is that people don't understand it. A lot of people
> are confused by it and initially think classpath is GPL. Maybe in the
> spirit of "Lesser GPL" it could be called the "Least GPL" or something
> ;-)
"Least GPL"? it doesn't work, it will be confused with LGPL.
What about BGPL?
It can be understood "Bad GPL" for some people, as well as "Better GPL"
for others!
;)
Cedric