This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: javax.naming work (Classpath vs ClasspathX)
- To: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: javax.naming work (Classpath vs ClasspathX)
- From: Olivier <olivier at zipworld dot com dot au>
- Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2001 10:35:35 +1000
- Cc: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <20011019221701.A21077@klomp.org> <87u1wvwe6i.fsf@creche.redhat.com> <20011019230555.A21190@klomp.org> <87lmi7jh9c.fsf@creche.redhat.com>
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 06:18:39PM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
>
> Richard asked me not to work on the libgcj AWT. He thinks it is
> important to support Transvirtual, since they are a free software
> company. And since they derive 100% of their revenue from relicensing
> AWT, releasing the libgcj AWT would undercut (his word) them.
>
Does that mean that it is actually possible to download Transvirtual implementation and somehow make it to work with gcj?
Olivier
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Olivier Louchart-Fletcher
Email: olivier@zipworld.com.au