This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: how complete is awt?
- To: tromey at redhat dot com, Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: how complete is awt?
- From: Niklas Fondberg <niklas dot fondberg at i3micro dot com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 18:19:06 +0200 (CEST)
- Cc: Niklas Fondberg <niklas dot fondberg at i3micro dot com>, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <1002786368.3bc54e4016d60@greyhound.i3micro.se> <87g08q9oml.fsf@creche.redhat.com>
> Niklas> Anything to think when compiling gcc?
> Niklas> Anything to think of when writing .java source?
>
> What do you mean?
I meant when writing awt apps...
Quoting Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>:
> >>>>> "Niklas" == Niklas Fondberg <niklas.fondberg@i3micro.com> writes:
>
> Niklas> how complete is awt?
>
> Not complete enough to run. I don't have a definite percentage.
>
> Niklas> And how does it translate?
> Niklas> GTK, X, QT???
>
> It is a fairly typical peer-based implementation. Right now there are
> some xlib peers, and a very small amount of Gtk+ peer code. You could
> write peers for Qt if you were so inclined.
>
> Niklas> Anything to think when compiling gcc?
> Niklas> Anything to think of when writing .java source?
>
> What do you mean?
>
> Tom
>
-------------------------------------------------
Niklas Fondberg I3 Micro Technology
niklas.fondberg@i3micro.org