This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: Recent gcc3.[01] Test Regressions for i686-pc-linux-gnu
- To: oldham at codesourcery dot com
- Subject: Re: Recent gcc3.[01] Test Regressions for i686-pc-linux-gnu
- From: Alexandre Petit-Bianco <apbianco at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 12:19:59 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc: java at gcc dot gnu dot org, mark at codesourcery dot com
- References: <200106291825.LAA07270@oz.codesourcery.com>
- Reply-To: apbianco at cygnus dot com
Jeffrey Oldham writes:
> Last night's nightly i686-pc-linux-gnu builds yielded new test
> regressions:
Hmm. My nightly builds aren't showing any regressions with the 3.0
branch, and one with the trunk, which appeared a couple of days ago.
http://www.cygnus.com/~apbianco/nightly/nightly.html
(the `check' column is the result of make check.) It's normal for the
BO column to show regression in 3.0 and none with the trunk. I
verified the libjava.logs manually to ensure that my scripts chewed
data and spitted results correctly.
> Is anyone else seeing these regressions? If so, can we reverse the
> code change that caused them?
I'm not aware of any Java compiler changes ever since things were
released -- I didn't approve any changes. 3.0's libjava doesn't seem
to have changed at all.
./A