This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: servlet code

To: David Brownell <david-b at pacbell dot net>
Subject: Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: servlet code
From: Per Bothner <per at bothner dot com>
Date: 15 Jun 2001 15:39:33 -0700
Cc: Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org>, java at gcc dot gnu dot org, pauls at euronet dot nl, classpathx-discuss at gnu dot org
References: <m2vglxjx5f.fsf@kelso.bothner.com><20010615231744.A6255@klomp.org> <m2puc5juqt.fsf@kelso.bothner.com><088a01c0f5ea$b5017d60$6800000a@brownell.org>

David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net> writes:

> The Java/XML stuff isn't [LGPL]... or rather, it won't be when I
> finish checking it in!  All GPL ...

You mean plain GPL, or modified GPL (as in libgcj and classpath).

The former should (IMO) prevent it from being installed in any
standard location, because it makes it too easy for people to
inadvertently violate the license.

> Though I tend to agree that we need an answer to that searchpath
> issue -- not all libraries should be in "libjava".  A Debian proposal got
> circulated a few months back; did that go anywhere?

That was the controversy ...
-- 
	--Per Bothner
per@bothner.com   http://www.bothner.com/per/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: servlet code
  - From: David Brownell

References:
- servlet code
  - From: Per Bothner
- Re: servlet code
  - From: Mark Wielaard
- Re: servlet code
  - From: Per Bothner
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: servlet code
  - From: David Brownell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]