This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: servlet code
>>>>> "Per" == Per Bothner <per@bothner.com> writes:
Per> However, having the extensions packages separate means having to
Per> resolve the library search rules. I.e. does the programmer need
Per> to specify explicit CLASSPATH (when compiling) or -l (when
Per> linking) to get the extension library? This is a somewhat
Per> controversial issue.
What is the controversy again?
I think when searching for .class files we ought to follow whatever
javac does. javac compatibility is a longstanding goal, and I think
it is a reasonable one.
Tom