This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: ICE in dwarf2out.c (Re: Gcj 3.0 on Itanium, again)

To: Jeff Sturm <jsturm at one-point dot com>
Subject: Re: ICE in dwarf2out.c (Re: Gcj 3.0 on Itanium, again)
From: Alexandre Petit-Bianco <apbianco at cygnus dot com>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 22:51:35 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: "'java at gcc dot gnu dot org'" <java at gcc dot gnu dot org>
References: <140D21516EC2D3119EE7009027876644049B5E08@hplex1.hpl.hp.com><15107.2404.811542.650993@deliverance.cygnus.com><3B046326.D81F186@one-point.com>
Reply-To: apbianco at cygnus dot com

Jeff Sturm writes:

> After considerable debugging it doesn't really appear dwarf2out.c is
> misbehaving at all.

Thank you for looking into this.

> I'd like to eventually look closely at how gcj emits debug info
> vs. other frontends.  In the meantime, we have this annoying bug on
> the branch.

I don't recall we're doing anything special with the types. As far as
the statements, we're making sure that emit_line_note gets called when
necessary.

> Any ideas on a quick fix for 3.0?  Perhaps the java driver can
> simply avoid -g1 altogether?  Neither -g0 nor -g2 exhibit the
> problem.

I was also thinking it could be an acceptable solution.

./A

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ICE in dwarf2out.c (Re: Gcj 3.0 on Itanium, again)
  - From: Jeff Sturm

References:
- Gcj 3.0 on Itanium, again
  - From: Boehm, Hans
- Re: Gcj 3.0 on Itanium, again
  - From: Alexandre Petit-Bianco
- ICE in dwarf2out.c (Re: Gcj 3.0 on Itanium, again)
  - From: Jeff Sturm

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]