This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: lobotomizing libgcj

To: jsturm at one-point dot com
Subject: Re: lobotomizing libgcj
From: Tony Kimball <alk at pobox dot com>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 20:31:26 -0500
Cc: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <15100.23495.140029.382860@spanky.love.edu><Pine.LNX.4.10.10105112003280.6886-100000@mars.deadcafe.org>
Reply-To: alk at pobox dot com

Quoth Jeff Sturm on Friday, 11 May:
: 
: On Fri, 11 May 2001, Tony Kimball wrote:
: > How about emitting a .o per method, as well as one for the class?
: 
: What's the benefit vs. one section per method, as Tom suggested?

Perhaps none?  I think that I misunderstood his suggestion on the
first pass.  I will investigate it more thoroughly now.  Thanks.

References:
- Re: lobotomizing libgcj
  - From: Tony Kimball
- Re: lobotomizing libgcj
  - From: Jeff Sturm

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]