This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: Fibonacci and performance
- To: "Boehm, Hans" <hans_boehm at hp dot com>
- Subject: Re: Fibonacci and performance
- From: Cedric Berger <cedric at wireless-networks dot com>
- Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 14:41:10 -0700
- CC: Java Discuss List <java at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- References: <140D21516EC2D3119EE7009027876644049B5DB7@hplex1.hpl.hp.com>
Thanks a lot!
Cedric
"Boehm, Hans" wrote:
> I think
>
> Manson and Pugh, Semantics of Multithreaded Java,
> http://www.cs.umd.edu/~pugh/java/memoryModel/semantics.pdf
>
> is pretty close to the current state of the proposal. The directory it's in
> has lots of background information.
>
> Hans
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Cedric Berger [mailto:cedric@wireless-networks.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 2:24 PM
> > To: Boehm, Hans
> > Cc: Java Discuss List
> > Subject: Re: Fibonacci and performance
> >
> >
> > "Boehm, Hans" wrote:
> >
> > > [...]
> > > This of course is not required by the C spec., nor does it
> > say a lot about
> > > other architectures. But if it's doing this right, then the C
> > > implementation should be very close to what's required by
> > the proposed new
> > > Java memory model.
> > >
> > > The new model of course also still requires atomicity for
> > longs and doubles.
> > > But that's free on Itanium and Alpha Linux.
> >
> > What is the "proposed new java memory model"?
> >
> > Cedric
> >
> >