This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
RE: SIGSEGV in jc1
- To: "'apbianco at cygnus dot com'" <apbianco at cygnus dot com>, "Boehm, Hans" <hans_boehm at hp dot com>
- Subject: RE: SIGSEGV in jc1
- From: "Boehm, Hans" <hans_boehm at hp dot com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 17:42:11 -0700
- Cc: "'Per Bothner'" <per at bothner dot com>, tromey at redhat dot com, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
I believe I had it all along. I updated and rebuilt with the same result.
It would still be good to see whether someone else gets the same result.
I tried building the calculator directly from source, and (for the first
time to my knowledge!) that worked correctly. There were still two other
less serious issues:
1) The source files contain copyright (C in a circle, code 251) symbols in
comments. I have no idea by what rules that's legal/illegal. But javac
seems to accept it, but gcj doesn't. (This stuff was written by real
lawyers, not language lawyers.)
2) I saw strange (IO related ?) failures when I tried to link statically.
Hans
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexandre Petit-Bianco [mailto:apbianco@cygnus.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 4:40 PM
> To: Boehm, Hans
> Cc: 'Per Bothner'; tromey@redhat.com; java@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: SIGSEGV in jc1
>
>
>
> Boehm, Hans writes:
>
> > I built the current 3.0 tree on X86 with limited success. If I try
> > to build my constructive reals calculator, it dies in jc1. The
> > original command line mentions one .java file and multiple .class
> > files.
>
> I think that this patch from Per was fixing the problem. Does your
> compiler have this patch?
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-04/msg00421.html
>
> ./A
>