This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: libgcj/1736
- To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: libgcj/1736
- From: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at waitaki dot otago dot ac dot nz>
- Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2001 12:56:59 +1300
- CC: gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org, David dot Billinghurst at riotinto dot com, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, java at gcc dot gnu dot org, rboehne at ricardo-us dot com, libtool at gnu dot org
- References: <3AA48CC4.2D704022@waitaki.otago.ac.nz> <orsnkrpecv.fsf@guarana.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> > So, it's trying to pass the compiler -Wl flag directly to the linker
> > for some reason. I hacked the libtool script a bit and everything
> > worked.)
>
> Care to post your hacks? :-)
All I did was to remove the "\${wl}"s from whole_archive_spec_flag.
Presumably thats not a correct fix ;-). Perhaps it would suffice to
simply clear "wl" when entering the incremental mode, assuming we know
the linker will always be called directly when doing incremental.
> I've been meaning to update libtool in the GCC tree, I was
> just waiting for his patch to go in and for a new snapshot to do some
> multi-platform testing of it.
OK, that would be great (probibly in libjava we should have the updated
ltdl also). I'll revisit this issue once the new libtool is in the tree.
regards
[ bryce ]