This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Alpha vs. new ABI

To: apbianco at cygnus dot com
Subject: Re: Alpha vs. new ABI
From: Jeff Sturm <jeff dot sturm at commerceone dot com>
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2001 10:35:35 -0500
CC: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Organization: Commerce One
References: <140D21516EC2D3119EE700902787664401E3A887@hplex1.hpl.hp.com> <87lmrqi61g.fsf@creche.redhat.com> <3A79C75C.375BCBFC@commerceone.com> <14970.28595.365557.587458@deliverance.cygnus.com> <3A7ACA0E.C6440276@commerceone.com> <14975.37526.839720.180301@deliverance.cygnus.com> <3A800C38.25809E23@commerceone.com> <14976.37861.260924.459215@deliverance.cygnus.com> <14976.43311.272595.516578@deliverance.cygnus.com>

Alexandre Petit-Bianco wrote:
> Done. This needed to move forward ;-) Thanks a lot for your help Jeff!

Thanks!  Now I presume alpha-linux builds out of the box.  It's time to add
`java' to my nightly testsuite runs and see what happens.

Hmm... what's the next target?  I have an old mipsel-unknown-linux-gnu box
around here somewhere, if anybody's interested.  I've built 2.95.2 on it before.

--
Jeff Sturm
jeff.sturm@commerceone.com

References:
- Re: Alpha vs. new ABI
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: Alpha vs. new ABI
  - From: Jeff Sturm
- Re: Alpha vs. new ABI
  - From: Alexandre Petit-Bianco
- Re: Alpha vs. new ABI
  - From: Jeff Sturm
- Re: Alpha vs. new ABI
  - From: Alexandre Petit-Bianco
- Re: Alpha vs. new ABI
  - From: Jeff Sturm
- Re: Alpha vs. new ABI
  - From: Alexandre Petit-Bianco
- Re: Alpha vs. new ABI
  - From: Alexandre Petit-Bianco

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]