This is the mail archive of the java-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: libgcj / Classpath relicensing and cooperation

To: "Joshua R. Poulson" <jrp at pun dot org>
Subject: Re: libgcj / Classpath relicensing and cooperation
From: Alexandre Oliva <oliva at lsd dot ic dot unicamp dot br>
Date: 08 Mar 2000 00:07:35 -0300
Cc: <java-discuss at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>
References: <140D21516EC2D3119EE700902787664456E6D0@hplex1.hpl.hp.com> <200003071914.LAA16841@ferrule.cygnus.com> <oru2ii895v.fsf@garnize.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <018001bf88a9$cb84ecc0$fedc3a9e@pdx.informix.com>

On Mar  7, 2000, "Joshua R. Poulson" <jrp@pun.org> wrote:

>> Can't we just refrain from adding the exception clause to the merged
>> AWT?

> It's better for the package to have a single license that's simple
> and might actually be read by a prospective developer.

Of course.  But if the choice is between no AWT and a GPLed AWT, I'm
all for the latter.  Well, actually, I'd be all for the latter
regardless of any other options :-)

-- 
Alexandre Oliva     http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/     Enjoy Guaraná
Cygnus Solutions, a Red Hat company        aoliva@{redhat, cygnus}.com
Free Software Developer and Evangelist    CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp
oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}   Write to mailing lists, not to me

References:
- RE: libgcj / Classpath relicensing and cooperation
  - From: Boehm, Hans
- RE: libgcj / Classpath relicensing and cooperation
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: libgcj / Classpath relicensing and cooperation
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: libgcj / Classpath relicensing and cooperation
  - From: Joshua R. Poulson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]