This is the mail archive of the java-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Dynamic class loading

To: Tom Tromey <tromey at cygnus dot com>
Subject: Re: Dynamic class loading
From: Alexandre Oliva <oliva at lsd dot ic dot unicamp dot br>
Date: 16 Feb 2000 02:22:58 -0200
Cc: Godmar Back <gback at cs dot utah dot edu>, krab at daimi dot au dot dk (Kresten Krab Thorup), mdw at cs dot berkeley dot edu (Matt Welsh), bryce at albatross dot co dot nz (Bryce McKinlay), java-discuss at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
References: <xz6emaezhzk.fsf@ariel.daimi.au.dk> <200002152203.PAA26351@faith.cs.utah.edu> <200002160409.UAA16870@ferrule.cygnus.com>

On Feb 16, 2000, Tom Tromey <tromey@cygnus.com> wrote:

>>>>>> "Godmar" == Godmar Back <gback@cs.utah.edu> writes:
Godmar> It seems that .so files should be treated more similar to .jar
Godmar> or .zip entries in a CLASSPATH than to a .class file.

Agreed.

> First, I don't have any problem changing the current implementation if
> that is what we decide.

> There are two reasons I like the way things are right now:

Can't we have both?

-- 
Alexandre Oliva     http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/     Enjoy Guaraná
Cygnus Solutions, a Red Hat company        aoliva@{redhat, cygnus}.com
Free Software Developer and Evangelist    CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp
oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}   Write to mailing lists, not to me

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Dynamic class loading
  - From: Tom Tromey

References:
- Re: Dynamic class loading
  - From: Kresten Krab Thorup
- Re: Dynamic class loading
  - From: Godmar Back
- Re: Dynamic class loading
  - From: Tom Tromey

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]