This is the mail archive of the java-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: awt or swing support?

To: Amancio Hasty <hasty at rah dot star-gate dot com>
Subject: Re: awt or swing support?
From: Tom Tromey <tromey at cygnus dot com>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2000 20:09:18 -0800 (PST)
Cc: Tom Tromey <tromey at cygnus dot com>, java-discuss at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
References: <200002120100.RAA23662@ferrule.cygnus.com><200002120106.RAA92902@rah.star-gate.com>

Amancio> Does it matter if someone ports the Sun's awt /swing stuff to
Amancio> gcj kinda of like an addon?

Matter in what way?  I think you're free to do that.  Of course, we
couldn't distribute it.  However, JNI isn't finished yet (I'm actively
working on it, but I don't have an ETA).  So making this work would
probably be hard.

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: awt or swing support?
  - From: Jeff Sturm

References:
- Re: awt or swing support?
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: awt or swing support?
  - From: Amancio Hasty

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]