This is the mail archive of the
java-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: Problems building libgcj...
- To: Java/Libgcj Mailing List <java-discuss at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: Problems building libgcj...
- From: Scott Bambrough <scottb at netwinder dot org>
- Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 14:24:55 -0500
- CC: Tom Tromey <tromey at cygnus dot com>
- Organization: Rebel.com
- References: <3891D88E.EDBC5F1@netwinder.org> <200001281829.KAA20579@ferrule.cygnus.com>
Tom Tromey wrote:
>
> Look for -I../ffi/include in Makefile.
> Try changing it to -I$(MULTIBUILDTOP)/../ffi/include
>
> If that works, tell me and I will check in the appropriate change.
Thanks, this seems to have gotten me by that problem. I attached a patch for
the change I made to Makefile.in.
> Unfortunately nobody builds libgcj multilibbed on a regular basis...
I wasn't aware I was until I looked. It automatically configured for it.
> Scott> 2) I had to modify the sources in the compilers gcc/java
>
> What files did you have to change?
javaop.h and gjavah.c. WORDS_TO_DOUBLE assembled doubles incorrectly, and the
NaN mask in gjavah.c was incorrect when FLOAT_WORDS_BIG_ENDIAN is true. I will
send the patch to gcc-patches with a proper changelog entry.
> I imagine your changes will be covered by your existing assignment,
> but it depends on exactly what you said in that assignment.
It's a futures assignment so it should be ok.
> I'm not positive. We're currently trying to merge libgcj and
> Classpath under a different license, under the ownership of the FSF.
> If this works out then things will change.
>
> If you're planning to sign papers for libgcj I can find out the real
> answer. If you're just curious, I won't.
Don't bother, I was just curious. I'm not ready to submit changes for libgcj
yet. I need to get it to build and test it first. I'll cross that bridge when
I come to it.
Scott
--
Scott Bambrough - Software Engineer
REBEL.COM http://www.rebel.com
NetWinder http://www.netwinder.org
Makefile.in.patch