This is the mail archive of the java-discuss@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: V3 ABI

To: apbianco at cygnus dot com
Subject: Re: V3 ABI
From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
Date: 07 Dec 2000 18:46:20 -0700
Cc: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at albatross dot co dot nz>, java-discuss at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
References: <OFD15F4B7E.B69F46AA-ON882569A7.007B49F4@diversifiedsoftware.com> <877l5lt2b9.fsf@creche.cygnus.com> <3A27205A.46C9F39E@albatross.co.nz> <87itp4spvl.fsf@creche.cygnus.com> <14896.10287.530632.892870@deliverance.cygnus.com> <87itovagwu.fsf@creche.redhat.com> <14896.12886.109099.840472@deliverance.cygnus.com>
Reply-To: tromey at redhat dot com

Alex> I was under the impression that the definition for Object.java
Alex> for gcj wouldn't change. gcj generated vtable for Object would
Alex> be created as usual, along with the dummy entries. So only
Alex> changing java/lang/Object.h would just force the C++ compiler to
Alex> do what we want. Am I missing something?

I guess not.  Cool.

Tom

References:
- Re: V3 ABI
  - From: Alexandre Petit-Bianco
- Re: V3 ABI
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: V3 ABI
  - From: Alexandre Petit-Bianco

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]