This is the mail archive of the java-discuss@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Very slow compiler?

To: java-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com
Subject: Re: Very slow compiler?
From: Alexandre Petit-Bianco <apbianco at cygnus dot com>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 17:49:18 -0700 (PDT)
References: <or66o4a8ag.fsf@guarana.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><87wvghh3b8.fsf@creche.cygnus.com><orog1r75pf.fsf@guarana.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><39CF1448.633E0702@albatross.co.nz><39CFC4C8.B3B5D1C8@commerceone.com><14799.56360.456756.978079@deliverance.cygnus.com><39CFED5F.B013541F@albatross.co.nz>
Reply-To: apbianco at redhat dot com

Bryce McKinlay writes:

> Thanks, this worked. Build times seem to be back to normal with this
> patch applied.

OK. Mines are still long, but I can't really compare because I don't
sanely remember how long a build used to take. Tom was the first one
to point out that builds were taking forever. I never noticed that
building libgcj was long until he mentioned it to me. Ever since, it's
been paranoia land -- I don't know what's a reasonable time anymore.

I think I'll have to try with a 1 or two months old tree.

./A

References:
- Very slow compiler?
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: Very slow compiler?
  - From: Jeff Sturm
- Re: Very slow compiler?
  - From: Alexandre Petit-Bianco
- Re: Very slow compiler?
  - From: Bryce McKinlay

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]