This is the mail archive of the java-discuss@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Inlining (was: Re: GCJ macro in libjava/Makefile)

To: java-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com
Subject: Re: Inlining (was: Re: GCJ macro in libjava/Makefile)
From: Alexandre Petit-Bianco <apbianco at cygnus dot com>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 15:24:39 -0700 (PDT)
References: <39CF668B.72BB304D@commerceone.com><oru2b4gr34.fsf@guarana.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><39CFC9D8.7E93C6A0@commerceone.com><14799.51628.890373.627581@deliverance.cygnus.com><39CFD17A.6E54761@commerceone.com>
Reply-To: apbianco at redhat dot com


Jeff Sturm writes:

> Yes.  At least for Java source.  Bytecode is another matter...

Well, the bytecode compiler needs to be modified to produce functions
as trees.

./A

References:
- GCJ macro in libjava/Makefile
  - From: Jeff Sturm
- Re: GCJ macro in libjava/Makefile
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: GCJ macro in libjava/Makefile
  - From: Jeff Sturm
- Re: GCJ macro in libjava/Makefile
  - From: Alexandre Petit-Bianco
- Inlining (was: Re: GCJ macro in libjava/Makefile)
  - From: Jeff Sturm

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]