This is the mail archive of the
java-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: Done with Gcj? Send us a link or a story!
- To: Mo DeJong <mdejong at cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: Done with Gcj? Send us a link or a story!
- From: Jeff Sturm <jeff dot sturm at appnet dot com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 13:10:38 -0400
- CC: Matt Welsh <mdw at cs dot berkeley dot edu>, java-discuss at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- Organization: AppNet
- References: <Pine.SOL.3.91.1000627231508.16439G@cse.cygnus.com>
Mo DeJong wrote:
> I would really like to get gcj working for my stuff so I can
> play around with embedded Linux + Java on a MBX PPC motherboard.
> The JVMs from Sun are never going to work in that sort
> of environment.
Yeah, I'm surprised how many Java developers haven't seriously tried the
open source VMs. For example, at the Java/Linux BOF at JavaOne, most of
the discussion was around commercial ports by Blackdown, IBM and Sun.
Gcj is already being used on targets where Sun's VM will never run. I
have been periodically evaluating gcj myself on Alpha/Linux, where there
is no good alternative (no JIT, anyway).
> > Any comments?
>
> Just one, I feel your pain. I have not even been able to get
> my Java project to compile with gcj! I am not trying to
> rip on anyone, I am just saying that things always seem
> to be broken. I have decided that my time would be better
> spent writing tests that can be used to test gcj
> compliance with the JLS. At large set of JLS tests
> will really help to point out compiler problems and
> make sure things stay fixed once they get fixed.
I've been encouraged by recent snapshots. The compiler and runtime are
very good, on the right day :\
Jacl builds/runs with gcj, now that we have java.beans and working
reflection. But I admit some of my projects are on hold until gcj
stabilizes a bit.
--
Jeff Sturm
jeff.sturm@appnet.com