This is the mail archive of the
java-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: libgcj.so vs. libgcjawt.so
- To: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at albatross dot co dot nz>
- Subject: Re: libgcj.so vs. libgcjawt.so
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Sat, 20 May 2000 10:11:03 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc: java-discuss at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- References: <39261333.7131A5D0@albatross.co.nz>
Bryce> With the java.beans stuff in, libgcj.so now depends on
Bryce> libgcjawt.so, which pretty much makes having them in separate
Bryce> .so's pointless.
I agree.
Bryce> I think we should stick everything into libgcj.so, and reserve
Bryce> libgcjawt.so for peers (Note that java/awt has no static
Bryce> dependency on the peers, they get loaded dynamically with
Bryce> forName()).
Sounds good. I'll do it soon if nobody beats me to it.
Tom