This is the mail archive of the java-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: inlining and string concatenation

To: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at albatross dot co dot nz>
Subject: Re: inlining and string concatenation
From: Tom Tromey <tromey at cygnus dot com>
Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 15:59:05 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: Tom Tromey <tromey at cygnus dot com>, Java Discuss List <java-discuss at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>
References: <87u2glsmnk.fsf@cygnus.com><390A4C7B.632FAE96@albatross.co.nz><m2vh118hlb.fsf@kelso.bothner.com><390D5561.96772B5C@albatross.co.nz><200005012245.PAA10491@ferrule.cygnus.com><390E0C26.9595CEC0@albatross.co.nz>

Bryce> Yes. I just wanted to point out that even my naive
Bryce> implementation did a lot better than the existing one, so this
Bryce> is a big performance hotspot.

Thanks.  I assume some of the common benchmarks must look at this?
I'm also curious to know how much this will help us in real code.
Implementing it is a fair amount of effort...

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: inlining and string concatenation
  - From: Cedric Berger

References:
- Re: inlining and string concatenation
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: inlining and string concatenation
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: inlining and string concatenation
  - From: Bryce McKinlay

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]