Re: question about arithmetic exceptions

[Alexandre Oliva <oliva at lsd dot ic dot unicamp dot br>]

On Nov 29, 1999, Godmar Back <gback@cs.utah.edu> wrote:

>> On Nov 29, 1999, Andrew Haley <aph@pasanda.cygnus.co.uk> wrote:

>> > Sure, that would work.  No disagreement.  But does the problem justify
>> > such a large reorganization of the compiler?

>> This reorganization is long due.  It's probably planned as part of the
>> major rework of gcc building infrastructure.  Just don't tell Godmar
>> I'm willing to try to introduce automake and libtool in that process
>> :-) :-)

> If this will add such "break-through" features as the ability to
> add linker scripts to libtool (or is it automake?), I'm all for it.
> ;-)

Absolutely.  But the introduction of libtool would allow for the
separate compilation of front-ends, and linking with a back-end shared
library.  And automake would give us at least automatic dependency
tracking.  But there's a long way to go before this becomes true.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva IC-Unicamp, Bra[sz]il
oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br,guarana.{org,com}} aoliva@{acm,computer}.org
oliva@{gnu.org,kaffe.org,{egcs,sourceware}.cygnus.com,samba.org}
** I may forward mail about projects to mailing lists; please use them