This is the mail archive of the java-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: .java to binary compilation problem

To: Jeff Sturm <jsturm at sigma6 dot com>
Subject: Re: .java to binary compilation problem
From: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at albatross dot co dot nz>
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 1999 14:20:55 +1300
CC: Per Bothner <per at bothner dot com>, java-discuss at sourceware dot cygnus dot com, warg at ce dot chalmers dot se
References: <381DF459.ED02C9@sigma6.com> <m21zaa9fdd.fsf@magnus.bothner.com> <381E0DBE.2EF9400A@sigma6.com>

Jeff Sturm wrote:

> Regardless of which is correct and which conforms to the JLS, a lot of
> existing Java code does not compile under gcj because of this "feature".

I just opened a PR for this bug:

http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/java-prs/1999-q4/msg00074.html

regards

  [ bryce ]

References:
- Re: .java to binary compilation problem
  - From: Jeff Sturm
- Re: .java to binary compilation problem
  - From: Per Bothner
- Re: .java to binary compilation problem
  - From: Jeff Sturm

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]