This is the mail archive of the java-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: inlining methods

To: Alexandre Petit-Bianco <apbianco at cygnus dot com>
Subject: Re: inlining methods
From: Jeff Sturm <jsturm at sigma6 dot com>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 1999 12:01:41 -0400
CC: java-discuss at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
Organization: AppNet
References: <199910262210.PAA06834@mnemosyne.CS.Berkeley.EDU> <m2u2nd3gmh.fsf@magnus.bothner.com> <14358.24168.998662.763044@deliverance.cygnus.com>

Alexandre Petit-Bianco wrote:

<snip>

> With this patch, I verified that at least `static int foo (int a, int
> b){ return a+b; }', provided that it is declared before it is used,
> gets inlined.

Very nice.  I was able to build a large source tree with -O3 after
applying this patch.  The code size grew by some 20% so it would seem
that inlining is taking place.  I verified that it is working for
private methods, at least.

-- 
Jeff Sturm
jsturm@sigma6.com

References:
- Re: inlining methods
  - From: Matt Welsh
- Re: inlining methods
  - From: Per Bothner
- Re: inlining methods
  - From: Alexandre Petit-Bianco

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]