This is the mail archive of the java-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the GCJ project. See the GCJ home page for more information.
Per Bothner wrote: > GCJ is not based on Kaffe. Some Kaffe-isms (such as field names) > may still exist, but consider them historical artifacts. And the fact that the internal structures generated by GCJ are almost identical to those used by Kaffe, especially the old 0.9.x release, is a mear coincidence? Even the field ordering is the same, the layout of the constant pool, the numbering of the states a class goes through while initialising. the method structure ... would you like me to go on ...? I even think it's bug compatible in places :) Regards Tim -- Tim Wilkinson Tel: +1 510 704 1660 Transvirtual Technologies, Inc., Fax: +1 510 704 1893 Berkeley, CA, USA. Email: tim@transvirtual.com