This is the mail archive of the
java-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
[Bug libgcj/27066] libgcj native socket code does not support IPv6
- From: "mckinlay at redhat dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: java-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 11 Apr 2006 18:08:21 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libgcj/27066] libgcj native socket code does not support IPv6
- References: <bug-27066-7432@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #4 from mckinlay at redhat dot com 2006-04-11 18:08 -------
You are correct - I didn't notice that setTcpNoDelay, etc, call getImpl() -
however, this could be fixed if neccessary.
The question is whether this fix is the best one. Is there any disadvantage
(performance or otherwise) to always using PF_INET6 sockets, even for IPv4
addresses?
--
mckinlay at redhat dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-04-11 18:08:20
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27066