This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [build] Move unwinder to toplevel libgcc (v2)

From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Rainer Orth <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE>, Pedro Alves <pedro at codesourcery dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de>, Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>, Steve Ellcey <sje at cup dot hp dot com>, Richard Earnshaw <richard dot earnshaw at arm dot com>, Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana dot radhakrishnan at arm dot com>, Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>, Douglas Rupp <rupp at gnat dot com>, Tristan Gingold <gingold at adacore dot com>, Mike Stump <mikestump at comcast dot net>, Kaz Kojima <kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org>, David Edelsohn <dje dot gcc at gmail dot com>, Sterling Augustine <augustine dot sterling at gmail dot com>, Arnaud Charlet <charlet at adacore dot com>, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Nicola Pero <nicola dot pero at meta-innovation dot com>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, Richard Sandiford <rdsandiford at googlemail dot com>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 16:37:38 +0200
Subject: Re: [build] Move unwinder to toplevel libgcc (v2)
References: <ydd1ux2oc1u.fsf@manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> <4E42AACB.2080802@gnu.org> <yddfwl9l0az.fsf@manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> <201108101750.43530.pedro@codesourcery.com> <4E43C318.4050401@gnu.org> <ydd7h6kkva3.fsf@manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1108111423510.15713@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>

On 08/11/2011 04:25 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:

>  The actual problem are not the runtime libraries, which already know to
>  search $builddir/.../libgcc for unwind.h and related files.  The
>  copyback is only for the benefit of the testsuite (gcc.target, g++.dg,
>  gnat.dg, and gcc.dg) where I was too lazy to deal with changing (or even
>  setting ) the include paths, but took the easy way out since gcc/include
>  is in the include path by default.

unwind.h is an installed header.  Are you sure nothing outside of GCC uses
it?

Why does it matter? It is still installed in trunk, and you could also move the installation to libgcc's Makefiles if it weren't copied anymore to $builddir/gcc/include.

Paolo

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [build] Move unwinder to toplevel libgcc (v2)
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

References:
- [build] Move unwinder to toplevel libgcc (v2)
  - From: Rainer Orth
- Re: [build] Move unwinder to toplevel libgcc (v2)
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: [build] Move unwinder to toplevel libgcc (v2)
  - From: Rainer Orth
- Re: [build] Move unwinder to toplevel libgcc (v2)
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: [build] Move unwinder to toplevel libgcc (v2)
  - From: Rainer Orth
- Re: [build] Move unwinder to toplevel libgcc (v2)
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]