This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: [build] Move unwinder to toplevel libgcc (v2)
On 08/05/2011 10:43 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 08/03/2011 03:32 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
>> It should incorporate all review comments and a few errors I've noticed
>> during final review have been corrected.
>>
>> I've received approval for the Darwin bits, Steve successfully tested on
>> HP-UX/IA64 and Linux/IA64 at least bootstrapped. VMS/IA64 approval has
>> been given conditional on the approval of the other IA64 bits. I've
>> also received approval for the libjava parts.
>>
>> Bootstrapped without regressions (together with the next two, to be
>> resubmitted shortly: fp-bit and soft-fp moves) on
>> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
>>
>> i386-pc-solaris2.10, sparc-sun-solaris2.11, alpha-dec-osf5.1b,
>> mips-sgi-irix6.5 and i386-apple-darwin9.8.0 bootstraps in progress.
>> powerpc-apple-darwin9.8.0 currently broken (SIGBUS compiling
>> c-family/c-pretty-print.c and cp/call.c).
>>
>> How should we proceed with this patch, especially given the quite
>> moderate comments from most affected target maintainers?
>
> ARM is the only target we should care a bit about. Any chance you can
> try cross-compiling it (with a combined tree it should not be hard)?
> Just to see that it builds.
ARM's unwinder is structured in a very different way to the others. I
agree that it needs to be tested carefully.
Andrew.