This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: [PATCH PING] unreviewed tree-slimming patches
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: Nathan Froyd <froydnj at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
- Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 12:06:43 -0600
- Subject: Re: [PATCH PING] unreviewed tree-slimming patches
- References: <4DDD0B95.40308@codesourcery.com>
>>>>> "Nathan" == Nathan Froyd <froydnj@codesourcery.com> writes:
Nathan> (C, Java, middle-end)
Nathan> [PATCH 18/18] make TS_BLOCK a substructure of TS_BASE
Nathan> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-03/msg00564.html
The Java parts are ok.
I think these sorts of changes should be obvious once approved from a
middle-end perspective, at least assuming that there are no regressions.
I say this because I think that once the core change has been decided
on, there is often just one way to go about fixing up the users; at
least, in a case like this where the consequence amounts to deleting
assignments.
I mentioned this idea before but I didn't see any discussion of it. I
am happy to continue looking at patches like this if that is what the
more active maintainers would prefer.
Tom