This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: [PATCH] Build libgcj, libgcj-tools, and libffi as shared libraries on Windows
- From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
- To: Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at googlemail dot com>
- Cc: "Aaron W. LaFramboise" <aaronavay62 at aaronwl dot com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 21:13:31 +0100
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Build libgcj, libgcj-tools, and libffi as shared libraries on Windows
- References: <48B0BD19.8080300@aaronwl.com> <49E02E0F.6040503@gmail.com> <49E064A2.60904@redhat.com> <49E07C02.7000105@gmail.com>
Dave Korn wrote:
> Andrew Haley wrote:
>
>>> I'm just putting this through a bootstrap at the moment. There's not going
>>> to be much to test because none of this used to be built on Cygwin at all
>>> before, so it can hardly regress. If it bootstraps and builds nice working
>>> DLLs, OK for HEAD?
>> I'm going to ask for libgcj test results: we need to know if it's fit for
>> use.
>
> Certainly. Will be many many hours before my bootstrap get to them, but
> I'll report back. As a guideline to what to expect, I get these results on
> 4.3.2 using a similar patch; maybe you could let me know if you see any
> patterns in there that would indicate fundamental brokenness.
Well, there are so many failures that it's unlikely any non-trivial program
would run. It's hard to know what the problems are without seeing the logs.
Andrew.