This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: [PATCH] Don't link ecj1 against libgcj.so.* (PR libgcj/38396)
- From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
- To: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
- Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Java Patch List <java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:02:50 +0000
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Don't link ecj1 against libgcj.so.* (PR libgcj/38396)
- References: <20081218093733.GW17496@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> <494A248A.2060203@redhat.com> <494A2C7E.9070400@gnu.org>
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> No. It's in conflict with the patch that I already wrote and posted
>> to the list, and I'm about to commit.
>
> In your patch you need to change -Wl,-L$(here)/.libs,-lgcj to
> -Wl,-L$(here)/.libs,-L$(here)/_libs,-lgcj to support OSes where the
> libtool internal directory is _libs (BTW maybe
> -Wl,-L.libs,-L_libs,-Wl,-lgcj works too?).
Which of those OSes support libgcj_bc.so? None, I think.
Despite my crossness about how this happened, I'm tempted to accept
Jakub's patch because it's less intrusive than mine.
Andrew.