This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH: PR libjava/32078: Update libtool in classpath

From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
To: Andrew Haley <aph-gcc at littlepinkcloud dot COM>
Cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>, "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Classpath Patches <classpath-patches at gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 14:17:00 +0200
Subject: Re: PATCH: PR libjava/32078: Update libtool in classpath
References: <20070527182203.GA12846@lucon.org> <20070527182317.GA21785@lucon.org> <18011.63129.596623.418727@zebedee.pink> <jeabvo54u8.fsf@sykes.suse.de> <18011.65442.528449.3955@zebedee.pink>

I'm not sure we should get into putting class files into autoconf
scripts, though.  I'm minded simply to accept HJ's patch rather than
do that.

If the libtool maintainers upstream appreciate our needs and are willing to do so, I think this is a much better solution. The language spec files can play tricks with linker options, that could be of interest to the libtool configuration process.

Paolo

References:
- PATCH: PR libjava/32078: Update libtool in classpath
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: PATCH: PR libjava/32078: Update libtool in classpath
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: PATCH: PR libjava/32078: Update libtool in classpath
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: PATCH: PR libjava/32078: Update libtool in classpath
  - From: Andreas Schwab
- Re: PATCH: PR libjava/32078: Update libtool in classpath
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]