This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Patch: initialize ProcessManager early

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
Cc: David Daney <ddaney at avtrex dot com>, GCJ-patches <java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org>
Date: 16 Feb 2007 08:45:07 -0700
Subject: Re: Patch: initialize ProcessManager early
References: <m37iuj174i.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <45D4F084.1030203@avtrex.com> <m364a3t3vq.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <17877.33095.33023.542808@zebedee.pink>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> writes:

Andrew> You have to wonder whether Java's Process / Streams interface is
Andrew> really a sensible way to spawn a process that does name lookup for
Andrew> stack traces .  An earlier version of this name lookup code was
Andrew> written in C++ and didn't use Process at all.

I don't remember why this change was made.  Windows support maybe?
Also I thought we had to do all process reaping in a single thread?

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Patch: initialize ProcessManager early
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: Patch: initialize ProcessManager early
  - From: David Daney

References:
- Patch: initialize ProcessManager early
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: Patch: initialize ProcessManager early
  - From: David Daney
- Re: Patch: initialize ProcessManager early
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: Patch: initialize ProcessManager early
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]