This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA/JVMTI] Implement GetLocalVariableTable and GetMaxLocals


>>>>> "Keith" == Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com> writes:

Keith> Of course, your original concern about the use of _Jv_AllocBytes is
Keith> still warranted: It should be using _Jv_MallocUnchecked, just like
Keith> _Jv_JVMTI_Allocate.

Yeah.  Or perhaps the internal interface should just return the
pointer, and we should copy them using _Jv_MallocUnchecked in the
jvmti layer.  This makes explicit who is responsible for the
allocation and freeing.

Keith> I was simply responding to your original question about how the memory
Keith> gets released. I apologize for any confusion.

No confusion here.  Thanks for looking this up.

Tom


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]