This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA] Add JDWP VM_INIT JVMTI callback


>>>>> "Marco" == Marco Trudel <mtrudel@gmx.ch> writes:

Marco> I just wonder how the GCC
Marco> staff are able to keep the quality so constant and
Marco> gcj... well... unfortunately not that constant.

You're doing probably the hardest build there is: a Canadian cross
targeting Windows.  The core gcj developers generally are doing native
builds, and not many gcj developers use Windows; also the ones who do
use Windows tend to be less active.  Finally, we're in a time where
gcj is changing rapidly, which makes the ordinary background problem
worse.

That's the explanation for how it is... but:

Marco> Can we do something to change that?

Yes, I think so.  One thing we could do is set up an automated tester
on the GCC compile farm (http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CompileFarm) that
does a build like yours.  That way breakage would be noticed more quickly.

Would you be able to set something up?  I may be able to help a bit;
we could take some infrastructure stuff from the Classpath builder.

Tom


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]