This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: regression: [MinGW] Slightly More Robust Stacktraces on Windows
On 10/6/06, Marco Trudel <mtrudel@gmx.ch> wrote:
I now got it working by reverting the latest three patches that were
applied to backtrace.h.
The question now is what to do. I don't think we can leave it broken, do
we? I currently don't have the time to debug and fix that myself, but I
could provide you the failing example (it's one line of code).
Or is it better to remove the patch?
I'm travelling right now (and will continue to for a month), so even
if you do send me the problematic code I can't do much with it. :-(
Sorry about that.
Thanks,
Ranjit.
Marco
Marco Trudel wrote:
> Ranjit Mathew wrote:
>> On 10/6/06, Marco Trudel <mtrudel@gmx.ch> wrote:
>>> I refer to this patch:
>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2006-q3/msg00051.html
>>>
>>> This breaks JNI in certain cases. The application just silently dies
>>> when trying to run a native method.
>>> Unfortunately it is a foreign library, I do not have it's source code to
>>> track the problem down.
>>> So Ranjit, do you have an idea what it could be?
>>
>> Sorry, off the top of my head I don't. You will have to
>> debug this. If asked for a wild guess, I would say
>> that libffi doesn't have frame-pointers enabled.
>>
>> Sorry I couldn't be of more help,
>
> Can we then revert that patch? I'm running out of time for my project
> and I needed already 2 days to track the problem down to that patch.
> I tried reverting only that patch but it fails. Reverting backtrace.h to
> the previous revision (115069) doesn't work as well. My application
> doesn't even start (with the patch it dies when trying to load the lib
> in question)
>
> Marco
>
>
--
Ranjit Mathew Email: rmathew AT gmail DOT com
Bangalore, INDIA. Web: http://rmathew.com/