This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [MinGW] RFA: Make Stack Traces Work for Interpreted Code on Windows

From: Bryce McKinlay <mckinlay at redhat dot com>
To: Ranjit Mathew <rmathew at gmail dot com>
Cc: java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 16:10:19 -0400
Subject: Re: [MinGW] RFA: Make Stack Traces Work for Interpreted Code on Windows
References: <e8qhm9$gh7$1@sea.gmane.org> <44B3E70F.4070009@redhat.com> <39399b9d0607111134yb7d0314i1e68fa4ef6773b03@mail.gmail.com> <44B4196D.8070808@redhat.com> <44B53154.6030402@gmail.com>

Ranjit Mathew wrote:

/* Store return addresses of the current program stack in STATE and return the exact number of values stored. */ void -fallback_backtrace (_Jv_UnwindState *state) +fallback_backtrace (_Unwind_Trace_Fn trace_fn, _Jv_UnwindState *state) {

The comment here should also be updated.

Bryce

References:
- [MinGW] RFA: Make Stack Traces Work for Interpreted Code on Windows
  - From: Ranjit Mathew
- Re: [MinGW] RFA: Make Stack Traces Work for Interpreted Code on Windows
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: [MinGW] RFA: Make Stack Traces Work for Interpreted Code on Windows
  - From: Ranjit Mathew
- Re: [MinGW] RFA: Make Stack Traces Work for Interpreted Code on Windows
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: [MinGW] RFA: Make Stack Traces Work for Interpreted Code on Windows
  - From: Ranjit Mathew

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]