This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [MinGW] RFC/RFA: Get Partial Stack Traces on Windows

On 7/5/06, Bryce McKinlay <mckinlay@redhat.com> wrote: 
> Since methods are called via the atable, the calling
> instruction is no longer a simple "CALL <XYZ>". The
> hack in fallback_backtrace() therefore doesn't work
> for methods called via indirect dispatch.
>

I don't think it'll work for ordinary virtual calls either, or even
non-local calls in a non-static-linked binary.


Yes. I realise that my testing was always with static
methods. :-(

Perhaps we should try to resurrect the c++filt bit in
NameFinder for such severely crippled targets...

Thanks,
Ranjit.

--
Ranjit Mathew      Email: rmathew AT gmail DOT com

Bangalore, INDIA. Web: http://rmathew.com/

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]