This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [ecj] Patch: FYI: another quick-stack-flushing patch

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
Cc: Java Patch List <java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Gcc Patch List <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: 21 Jun 2006 08:09:38 -0600
Subject: Re: [ecj] Patch: FYI: another quick-stack-flushing patch
References: <m3ac88rbh8.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <17559.52368.503857.634692@dell.pink> <m37j3bq1zm.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <m3r71jn0e9.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <17560.64888.618088.804416@dell.pink>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> writes:

>> FYI -- this triggers PR 19505.  I marked it as an ecj blocker.  I left
>> the patch on the branch, though, as it is really what we need.

Andrew> But Andrew Pinski's patch fixes that, doesn't it?

I don't think it will apply any more.

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ecj] Patch: FYI: another quick-stack-flushing patch
  - From: Andrew Haley

References:
- [ecj] Patch: FYI: another quick-stack-flushing patch
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: [ecj] Patch: FYI: another quick-stack-flushing patch
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: [ecj] Patch: FYI: another quick-stack-flushing patch
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: [ecj] Patch: FYI: another quick-stack-flushing patch
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: [ecj] Patch: FYI: another quick-stack-flushing patch
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]