This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: GCJ on Darwin/i386 patches
- From: Eric Christopher <echristo at apple dot com>
- To: Sandro Tolaini <tolaini at libero dot it>
- Cc: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org Patches" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Java Patches <java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2006 13:20:49 -0700
- Subject: Re: GCJ on Darwin/i386 patches
- References: <13B3F250-98ED-4F0C-8A59-2DA655051693@libero.it> <58FCFE40-113E-4823-BBD4-ABC5C9AFBD68@apple.com> <C3A011BA-CB72-45DC-8B6C-AFEC0B8C79BC@libero.it> <CA60244C-9181-480C-8569-D51445A688B5@apple.com> <A6B6E8FD-23AC-4CEA-8672-AC1169FE16DA@libero.it> <975DA8AE-5D12-4A43-A3E9-2A41AB84E0ED@libero.it>
On Apr 8, 2006, at 12:30 PM, Sandro Tolaini wrote:
On 02/apr/2006, at 19:00, Sandro Tolaini wrote:
I still haven't seen my patches committed to the trunk. I'd
propose to leave the libgcc stuff aside for the moment, and commit
all the other patches. In the meantime, we could figure out how to
fix the missing symbol stuff.
Please, could you tell me who is in charge of reviewing and
checking in these patches? I think that the basic Java support in
OSX/Intel introduced by these patches is interesting, but if the
patches don't get in the GCC repository my work will not be useful
to many people...
Agreed. The patches looked fine to me, but I'm not an approver for
the areas that they touched yet.
-eric