This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Documenting what changed since 4.0 (gcj core libraries)

From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
To: David Daney <ddaney at avtrex dot com>
Cc: Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 00:03:23 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: Documenting what changed since 4.0 (gcj core libraries)
References: <1138617600.5717.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> <m3acddlo09.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <1138714399.5680.25.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1138718247.5680.32.camel@localhost.localdomain> <Pine.BSF.4.62.0602052327270.290@pulcherrima.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <43E682E9.601@avtrex.com>

On Sun, 5 Feb 2006, David Daney wrote:
>> +	    <li>revalidate and repaint fixes which make Free Swing
>> +	    much more responsive.</li>
>> "Revalidate"?
> I don't know.  'revalidate' and 'repaint' are method names.  Since java is
> case sensitive capitalizing seems a bit questionable.

That's more than just a bit questionable in that case, I guess. ;-)

I had thought these two were more general terms, not method names.
By marking this up as <code>revalidate</code> and <code>repaint</code>
we'd avoid any disambiguity.

Thanks for pointing this out, David!

Gerald

References:
- Re: Documenting what changed since 4.0 (gcj core libraries)
  - From: Mark Wielaard
- Re: Documenting what changed since 4.0 (gcj core libraries)
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer
- Re: Documenting what changed since 4.0 (gcj core libraries)
  - From: David Daney

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]